To save as PDF: Chrome → Ctrl+P → Save as PDF → enable Background graphics
| Area | Research Studio | Drafting |
|---|---|---|
| FIR analysis — ingredients, defects, quashing scope | ✓ | — |
| Bail — regular (Section 480/483 BNSS) | ✓ | ✓ Regular Bail Application |
| Anticipatory bail (Section 482 BNSS) | ✓ | ✓ Anticipatory Bail Application |
| Quashing petitions (Section 528 BNSS) | ✓ Bhajan Lal analysis | ✓ Quashing Petition |
| Discharge applications (Sessions + Magistrate) | ✓ | ✓ Discharge Application |
| Criminal complaints (Section 223 BNSS) | ✓ | ✓ Criminal Complaint |
| POCSO Act 2012 — defence strategy | ✓ | — |
| SC/ST (Atrocities) Act — AB bar, defence | ✓ | — |
| NDPS Act — Section 37 bail, Section 50 recovery | ✓ | — |
| Compounding of offences (Section 359 BNSS) | ✓ | — |
| Sentencing and mitigation arguments | ✓ | — |
| BNS offence ingredients (property, person, economic) | ✓ | — |
| Trial process — charge framing, Section 313, acquittal | ✓ | — |
| S.138 NI Act — cheque dishonour offence, deadlines, defences | ✓ | ✓ S.138 Complaint + S.138 Reply |
| S.138 NI Act — demand notice validity & service checklist | ✓ Notice checklist built-in | ✓ Appended to every S.138 draft |
The Research Studio uses Claude Sonnet with a dedicated criminal law specialist block. Responses include statutory provisions with dual-law citations (BNS/IPC, BNSS/CrPC, BSA/IEA), Bhajan Lal category analysis for quashing, ingredient-by-ingredient defence mapping, and strategic guidance. All uncertain case citations are tagged [UNCERTAIN:].
Provide the full FIR text or a summary of allegations. The AI will: map each offence's statutory ingredients; identify which ingredients are absent from the FIR; flag procedural defects (delayed registration, Section 154 BNSS / 173 CrPC compliance, IO jurisdiction); assess quashing prospects; and recommend the immediate step (anticipatory bail, regular bail, or quashing petition).
Specify whether the offence attracts a statutory bail bar (NDPS Section 37, PMLA Section 45, UAPA). The AI will identify the applicable provision, construct grounds tailored to the facts, advise on parity arguments, and flag if the bail bar applies and how to address it.
The AI analyses FIR allegations against the Bhajan Lal categories, identifies the strongest grounds for quashing, and advises whether a settlement-based quashing is permissible (offence-by-offence). It also advises on the procedural steps — where to file, whether to seek simultaneous stay.
Paste the charge sheet summary or list the materials available. The AI will go through each ingredient of each offence and identify which are unsupported, then frame the discharge submissions.
For POCSO, SC/ST Act, and NDPS matters — specify the section, the key facts, and the stage. The AI provides law-specific analysis: POCSO trial procedure, SC/ST Act anticipatory bail bar, NDPS Section 50 compliance.
Access via the ✍ Draft button in Research Studio (research-led drafting) or via My Cases → Draft accordion (case-file-linked drafts).
What the AI generates: Complete complaint in formal court language — before the Magistrate / JMFC; chronological numbered facts; offence ingredients mapped to BNS/IPC sections; list of documents accompanying; prayer for cognizance, summons/warrant, investigation, and compensation; verification on solemn affirmation.
What the AI generates: Formal application with full heading and case number; FIR and custody details; numbered grounds addressing nature of offence, ingredients not met, community roots, no flight/tampering risk, parity with co-accused, custody period; NDPS Section 37 paragraph (if applicable); prayer; verification. Addresses statutory bail bars expressly where present.
What the AI generates: Application to Sessions Court or HC; basis of apprehension; ingredient-by-ingredient negation of the offence alleged; motive for false implication; cooperation with investigation; conditions applicant submits to (passport surrender, reporting, no contact with witnesses); SC/ST Act prima facie case assessment if applicable; prayer for direction that in the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail.
What the AI generates: Writ Petition (Criminal) in HC format; full FIR and proceedings particulars; numbered grounds citing the specific Bhajan Lal category applicable to the facts; settlement paragraph (if applicable); prayer for record, quashing of FIR/charge sheet, stay of trial; verification.
What the AI generates: Application before Sessions Court (or Magistrate with appropriate provision); opening stage averment; ingredient-by-ingredient analysis for each offence charged; grounds highlighting absence of evidence, legal inadmissibility, or wrong implication; submissions on the discharge test (not a mini-trial; no weighing of evidence); prayer for discharge and release; verification.
Standard criminal vakalatnama under Order III Rule 4 CPC, adapted for criminal courts.
What the AI generates: Complete criminal complaint for filing before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class). Includes: all three statutory pre-conditions (dishonour → demand notice → 15-day default); cheque and return memo particulars; averment that notice was served by RPAD; prayer for cognizance, summons, and Section 143A interim compensation (20% of cheque amount). Automatically appends a Service & Validity Checklist covering the triple deadline, RPAD service, AD card preservation, and the full-amount requirement.
What the AI generates: Formal reply / defence statement for the accused. Raises available defences: cheque given as security (not for legally enforceable debt); pre-existing dispute; no consideration; time-barred notice; defective service of demand notice; partial payment made before notice. Includes a Reply Service Checklist ensuring the reply is sent within the notice period by RPAD.
Research Studio: "Analyse this FIR for offence ingredients, missing elements, and procedural defects. Assess quashing prospects under Section 528 BNSS."
If arrest is imminent → Draft accordion: Anticipatory Bail Application (Section 482 BNSS). File immediately in Sessions Court or HC.
If arrested → Draft accordion: Regular Bail Application (Section 483 BNSS). File before Sessions Court.
Once bail is secured → Research Studio: "Which Bhajan Lal category covers this FIR? Is a settlement sufficient to support quashing? What documents should I file with the quashing petition?"
Draft accordion: Quashing Petition (Section 528 BNSS). File in HC with simultaneous stay application.
Obtain charge sheet. Research Studio: "Charge sheet under Section [X] BNS. Materials are [describe]. Which ingredients of the offence are absent from the charge sheet?" — AI maps each ingredient against the evidence.
Research Studio: "Is the only evidence against my client a co-accused's statement? Is a co-accused's confession admissible under Section 52 BNSS (Section 26 IEA / Section 22 BSA)?" — AI advises on inadmissibility arguments.
Draft accordion: Discharge Application (Section 250 BNSS). File at the hearing fixed for consideration of charge — before charges are framed.
If discharge refused → file Revision in HC / consider Section 528 BNSS petition challenging the cognizance / charge-framing order.
Research Studio: "POCSO case under Section 3/7 POCSO Act 2012. Child's age — school certificate says [X], bone ossification report says [Y]. Which document is determinative?" — AI advises on age determination law.
Research Studio: "Complaint was filed [N] months after the alleged incident. The family and the accused's family had a land dispute. What weight do courts give to delayed complaint in POCSO? What is the legal position on false implication under Section 22 POCSO?"
Research Studio: "My client is the employer of the child's parent. What is the bail position before a Sessions Court / HC for Section 5(l) POCSO (aggravated — person in position of trust)?"
Draft accordion: Regular Bail Application — addressing POCSO's non-bailable status and countering each restrictive factor.
Research Studio: "NDPS case. Recovery from a vehicle my client was travelling in (not on his person). Does Section 50 NDPS apply to vehicle searches? What is the law on when Section 50 is mandatory?"
Research Studio: "The panchnama shows no Gazetted Officer or Magistrate was present during the search. The IO says the accused did not demand a Gazetted Officer. What is the legal consequence of Section 50 non-compliance under the current SC position?"
Research Studio: "2 kg cannabis — is this small quantity, intermediate, or commercial quantity under the NDPS Notification? What is the mandatory minimum sentence if convicted at commercial quantity?"
Draft accordion: Regular Bail Application — with specific Section 37 NDPS paragraph addressing both conditions (not guilty / not likely to re-offend).
Research Studio: "SC/ST Act complaint. Accused [Name] is an OBC. Complainant claims he belongs to [SC community]. What documents establish the caste? Is there a caste certificate requirement?" — AI explains burden of proof on caste identity.
Research Studio: "The altercation was over a boundary wall dispute that has been ongoing for 3 years. The complaint does not allege that the insult was made because of the complainant's caste. What is the legal position on the 'on the ground of caste' ingredient — is it automatically satisfied?"
Research Studio: "Section 18 SC/ST Act bars anticipatory bail. Under what circumstances has the SC/HC granted AB despite Section 18? What must I show — that no prima facie case is made out?"
Draft accordion: Anticipatory Bail Application — with specific section addressing why a prima facie case under SC/ST Act is not established on the facts.
After conviction, court must hold a separate sentencing hearing (Section 360 BNSS). Research Studio: "My client has been convicted under Section [X] BNS. He is [age], first offender, family circumstances [describe]. What mitigating factors are recognised by the Supreme Court for sentencing?"
Research Studio: "Is the Probation of Offenders Act 1958 available for this offence? What are the conditions courts typically impose when releasing on probation?"
Prepare written sentencing submissions — argue each mitigating factor with citations from the Bachan Singh framework; request probation or minimum sentence; distinguish aggravating factors.
Research Studio: "My client received a cheque for Rs. [X] that was dishonoured. The return memo says 'insufficient funds'. What are the three deadlines under Section 138 NI Act? Does the consideration for which the cheque was issued matter?" — AI explains the triple deadline and the Section 139 presumption of legally enforceable debt.
Draft accordion → Legal Notice (S.138 sub-type): Generate the statutory 15-day demand notice. The AI automatically appends a Service & Validity Checklist at the end. Verify every item — especially: RPAD service only, full cheque amount demanded, AD card preserved, notice issued within 30 days of return memo.
Wait 15 days. If accused does not pay → Draft accordion → S.138 NI Act Complaint: File before the JMFC in the jurisdiction where your bank (the presenting bank) is located. File within 30 days of the 15-day window closing.
At first hearing → apply for Section 143A interim compensation (20% of cheque amount). Court may grant it on the first date without full argument.
If accused has a defence (security cheque / pre-existing dispute / defective notice) → Draft accordion → S.138 Reply: Send reply within the 15-day period. Raise the defence in writing before the window closes — helps establish a genuine dispute on record.
Research Studio: "Accused claims the cheque was given as security. Does this rebut the Section 139 presumption? What evidence must the accused produce? What is the standard of proof — balance of probabilities or prima facie?" — AI cites the SC position on the reverse burden under Sections 138-139.
| Source | Reliability | What the AI does |
|---|---|---|
| SC landmark cases (Arnesh Kumar, Bachan Singh, Bhajan Lal, Sushil Kumar Sharma) | High | Cited directly with [REF: CASE] |
| BNS / BNSS / BSA sections (post July 2024) | High | Cited directly with CrPC/IPC mapping in parentheses |
| NDPS Act / POCSO Act / SC/ST Act sections | High | Cited directly |
| S.138 NI Act landmark cases (Rangappa, Meters & Instruments, M.S. Narayana Menon) | High | Cited directly with [REF: CASE] |
| HC bail / quashing orders | Low | Marked [UNCERTAIN:] — verify on Indian Kanoon |
| Sessions Court / Magistrate orders | Very Low | Not cited — AI advises on legal position only |
| SC cases on bail (non-landmark) | Low–Medium | Marked [UNCERTAIN:] unless AI is certain |
All AI-generated research and drafts must be reviewed by a qualified senior advocate before filing. The AI provides a structured starting point — professional judgment on facts, strategy, and court-specific practice remains yours. Citations marked [UNCERTAIN] must be verified on Indian Kanoon or SCC Online before use in court.